Clearview Cancer Center

Quick Links:

Clearview News Wire

Copyright © 2007 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.



Ultrasound effective at spotting breast cancers

Last Updated: 2009-12-02 11:10:57 -0400 (Reuters Health)

December 3, 2009

By Julie Steenhuysen

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Breast ultrasounds found 100 percent of suspicious cancers in women under 40 who found lumps or other suspicious areas of the breast, offering a cheaper, less-invasive alternative to surgery or biopsies, U.S. researchers said on Wednesday.

They said targeted ultrasound -- which examines just the area of the breast where a lump is identified -- should become the standard of care for women under 40.

The findings may address some of the concerns raised by a federal advisory panel about breast exams done by women or doctors to investigate lumps or hot spots in the breast, which most often turn out to be harmless.

In a controversial set of recommendations issued last month, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommended that women not be taught to perform self breast exams because they often result in worry and expense for tests, biopsies and unnecessary surgery.

"That concerns us because while breast cancer in young women is rare, it absolutely does occur. Often, those cancers are only diagnosed because the woman noticed the lump in her breast or her doctor noticed a lump in her breast," said Dr. Constance Lehman of the University of Washington and director of imaging at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, who presented her findings at the Radiological Society of America meeting in Chicago.

"There are harms that follow after a woman does a self breast exam -- unnecessary surgeries, unnecessary biopsies. To that point, what we're saying is if you use imaging appropriately you can avoid those harms," Lehman said in a telephone interview.

Lehman did two studies testing the effectiveness of ultrasound to distinguish between potentially cancerous lumps and harmless masses in younger women.

In one, they studied more than 1,100 ultrasound exams of women under age 30. In the second, they studied 1,500 exams in women aged 30 to 39.

In both studies, ultrasound correctly identified the cancers and all of the benign breast changes. The only cancer not found was in a region of the breast that was not identified as an area of concern. Instead, it was identified by a full breast mammogram.

"Less than 3 percent of the patients that presented in this way had cancer. But it's important for us to find those patients that did have cancer," Lehman said.

"We had 26 women whose cancers were diagnosed because they brought the lump to the attention of their doctor, or their doctor brought the lump to the attention of the breast imaging specialist," she said.

Lehman said in the United States there is no standard way of treating women under age 40 who find a lump in their breast.

"Some of them go to the operating room to have the lump removed. Others have it followed. Others have a needle biopsy and we wanted to bring some clarity to this treatment," she said.

She said ultrasound is a quick and easy test that uses sound waves to create an image of the breast. It typically costs $100 to $200 per exam.

Lehman said using ultrasound could help balance some of the harms of overtreatment with the benefits of self breast exams in women under age 40, who are too young for routine mammogram screening even under the American Cancer Society guidelines.

The task force also recommended against routine mammogram screening for women in their 40s for many of the same reasons, a change the American Cancer Society and many other breast cancer experts reject.

Other Articles:

July 27, 2010
Low-risk prostate cancer treated aggressively
July 22, 2010
California city approves marijuana farming
July 22, 2010
No Pap smears for women under 21: guidelines
July 21, 2010
Darker skin doesn't mean melanoma immunity
July 21, 2010
New study backs Avastin in lung cancer
July 19, 2010
Americans turn cold shoulder to sunscreen: poll
July 19, 2010
Lung cancer often recurs more than 5 years after resection
July 16, 2010
U.S. cancer group endorses newer breast cancer drugs
July 15, 2010
Palliative care lacking in much of the world
July 12, 2010
Fish oil might lower breast cancer risk
July 12, 2010
Study finds prostate screening cuts cancer deaths
June 29, 2010
Cancer survivors are often parents of youngsters
June 23, 2010
B vitamins make no difference in heart disease, cancer
June 22, 2010
Top court rejects Pfizer punitive damages appeal
June 21, 2010
Cord blood transplants a viable option in leukemia
June 21, 2010
Untreated prostate cancer no death sentence
June 16, 2010
Sugary foods linked to pancreatic cancer risk
June 15, 2010
Mastectomy rates still declining across US
June 10, 2010
Waiter, there's a potential carcinogen in my soup
June 8, 2010
Breast cancer drug extends lives: study
June 8, 2010
Drug fights tumors in advanced lung cancer
June 5, 2010
Estrogen-like lignan diet, less breast cancer linked
June 4, 2010
New test can predict return of prostate cancer
View All Cancer News