Join Us On Facebook.
Follow us on Twitter.
Clearview News Wire
Copyright © 2007 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.
Tanning beds raise melanoma risk, US study finds
May 28, 2010
Tanning beds raise melanoma risk, US study findsLast Updated: 2010-05-27 15:08:39 -0400 (Reuters Health)
By Julie Steenhuysen
CHICAGO (Reuters) - Indoor tanning beds sharply increase the risk of melanoma, the deadliest kind of skin cancer, and the risk increases over time, U.S. researchers said on Thursday, and others experts called for tighter regulation.
They said people who use any type of tanning bed for any amount of time are 74 percent more likely to develop melanoma, and frequent users are 2.5 to 3 times more likely to develop the skin cancer than people who never use them.
Nonetheless, the study confirms prior research linking indoor tanning beds with melanoma, and answers any lingering questions about whether the practice is safe, or if the risk depends on the type of tanning bed used.
"We found that it didn't matter the type of tanning device used; there was no safe tanning device," said DeAnn Lazovich of the University of Minnesota, whose study appeared in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention.
Studies had suggested younger people were at greater risk, but Lazovich said the risk rises with frequency of use, regardless of age, gender or the device used.
"The increased risks we have reported are the risks associated with indoor tanning above and beyond any other known risk factors for melanoma," Lazovich said in a telephone briefing.
STRONGER REGULATION
Dr. Allan Halpern, chief of dermatology at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, told the briefing that melanoma cases are on the rise in the United States and the findings strengthen the case for regulating tanning beds.
He said the World Health Organization already classifies tanning beds as a human carcinogen, but in the United States, tanning beds are considered a class 1 medical device - "which is the equivalent of tongue depressors," he said.
The FDA has been reconsidering this classification and on Wednesday the agency released a video saying the use of any ultraviolet or UV-emitting device for the purpose of tanning should be avoided.
"I'm hopeful it will be very helpful in the hands of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to move forward to regulate this industry," said Halpern, who was not involved in the research.
For the study, Lazovich and colleagues studied 1,167 people diagnosed with melanoma and compared them with 1,101 people who did not have melanoma.
The team asked people which type of tanning bed they had used -- those that emit UVA radiation or UVB radiation.
They found that melanoma risk was about 3 times greater among people who had used tanning beds that emit UVB rays and 4.4 times greater for UVA-emitting devices.
They also found that risk increased with use. They defined frequent use as people who used indoor tanning for more than 50 hours, or more than 100 sessions, or for more than 10 years.
Still, experts say the absolute risk than an individual person will develop melanoma from tanning bed use is small.
Melanoma is fairly rare, accounting for about 3 percent of skin cancer cases, but it causes most skin cancer deaths, and doctors have few effective treatments to offer once the disease has spread.
According to the American Cancer Society, 68,000 people were diagnosed with melanoma in 2009, and 8,650 died of it.
SOURCE: http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/early/2010/05/21/1055-9965.EPI-09-1249.abstract?sid=c09fa74e-ea4e-4d46-8e4d-9180931179c8
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, online May 26, 2010.
Top
Tweet
Other Articles:
- February 3, 2012
- Senators urge Komen to reconsider funding decision
- February 1, 2012
- Eating fish tied to lower risk of colon polyps
- January 31, 2012
- Kids seek tans, use less sunscreen as they Age
- January 18, 2012
- FDA approves BTG's drug for cancer toxicity
- January 5, 2012
- Argentina's Fernandez undergoes cancer surgery
- December 20, 2011
- Vitamin D has mixed effects on cancer, broken bones
- December 13, 2011
- Memory issues after cancer may not be due to chemo
- December 8, 2011
- Quicker radiation therapy doubles mastectomy risk
- December 7, 2011
- Prostate cancer hormonal therapy cuts deaths: report
- November 17, 2011
- More fruit tied to lower risk of uterine fibroids
- November 15, 2011
- Brain scan study finds evidence of 'chemo brain'
- November 9, 2011
- No link between selenium, lower lung cancer risk
- November 8, 2011
- Singer Andy Williams reveals he has cancer
- November 7, 2011
- More evidence obesity tied to colon cancer
- November 4, 2011
- More evidence obesity tied to colon cancer
- October 31, 2011
- Heavy drinking tied to higher stomach cancer risk
- October 28, 2011
- Heavy drinking tied to higher stomach cancer risk
- October 27, 2011
- Doctors split on Avastin for breast cancer: survey
- October 21, 2011
- More breast cancer diagnosed in women with diabetes
- October 20, 2011
- US health panel cautious on HPV screening vs Pap
- October 19, 2011
- Girls' HPV vaccination rates falling short
- October 18, 2011
- Should your hairdresser screen you for skin cancer?
- October 14, 2011
- Flaxseed may not cool hot flashes
- October 12, 2011
- Vitamin E tied to higher risk of prostate cancer
- October 10, 2011
- Antioxidants tied to mixed effects in breast cancer
- September 28, 2011
- Diabetes again linked to colon cancer risk